- Member ID
- #9039
- Messages
- 1,244
- Reactions
- 1,807
- Likes
- 162
- City
- Kingsport
- State
- TN
- Country
- United States
- Vehicle
- Trackhawk, RS3 Swapped Golf R, Turbo Stang, Golf R
Guys I need a little advice here. Just put a rod thru my 6.2 block on my Trackhawk. I have a Magnuson 2650. Im currently building a 426 Stroker with Diamond pistons, Boostline Rods from Wiseco and a Callies crank with Thitek heads and lightweight valves with a Custom Comp cam.
Right now the car made 815 whp on a Mustang dyno on 93 octane/meth which is about 900 whp on a dynojet and 900 whp on E85. I have a FORE 3x. So I have two questions maybe u guys can help out with.
1.) Im reaching the point where im about the hit the ceiling on power with 93 octane/meth. I wanted to upgrade to the Whipple 3.0 ported from Dustin. Or I was gonna send the Magnuson to Jokers to have it ported. Much cheaper. $1250 vs. $10k for the whipple ported. The problem im having is I have spoken with two ppl who have ported their Maggi 2650 and have actually lost power. Granted, these were stock motors with stock heads. Is the benifit from the port only realized when u have a larger CI motor and better flowing heads?
Im at the point where I just cant make much more power on 93 octane so im wondering if the ported Whipple is just a waste of money on 93 octane. On E or C16 its a no brainer. There is no doubt the Whipple makes more power and is more efficient tho. I know this for a fact cause we sawpped the Maggi on my buddys Trackhawk and he went over 2 tenths faster at 9.50 in the quarter vs 9.75 with the Maggi. The Maggi is not ported tho.
2.) To utilize the power the Maggi or the Whipple can make I really need to jump up to 1700's to run E. Currently I have 1300's. Are u guys able to tune and drive around on 93 octane with 1700 injectors cause I was told the 1700's dont do well on 93 octane as far as drivability.
Anyone here driving on 1700's with 93 octane? Would be nice to run the 1700's then I can run E85 otherwise I will be stick with C16. Im moving to Kingsport TN and they have E85 at the dam gas pump there! But considering I get 9.5 MPG now I wont be using E very often. Again, this is my DD. I have other cars to drive but I love driving this and drive it every day!
Right now the car made 815 whp on a Mustang dyno on 93 octane/meth which is about 900 whp on a dynojet and 900 whp on E85. I have a FORE 3x. So I have two questions maybe u guys can help out with.
1.) Im reaching the point where im about the hit the ceiling on power with 93 octane/meth. I wanted to upgrade to the Whipple 3.0 ported from Dustin. Or I was gonna send the Magnuson to Jokers to have it ported. Much cheaper. $1250 vs. $10k for the whipple ported. The problem im having is I have spoken with two ppl who have ported their Maggi 2650 and have actually lost power. Granted, these were stock motors with stock heads. Is the benifit from the port only realized when u have a larger CI motor and better flowing heads?
Im at the point where I just cant make much more power on 93 octane so im wondering if the ported Whipple is just a waste of money on 93 octane. On E or C16 its a no brainer. There is no doubt the Whipple makes more power and is more efficient tho. I know this for a fact cause we sawpped the Maggi on my buddys Trackhawk and he went over 2 tenths faster at 9.50 in the quarter vs 9.75 with the Maggi. The Maggi is not ported tho.
2.) To utilize the power the Maggi or the Whipple can make I really need to jump up to 1700's to run E. Currently I have 1300's. Are u guys able to tune and drive around on 93 octane with 1700 injectors cause I was told the 1700's dont do well on 93 octane as far as drivability.
Anyone here driving on 1700's with 93 octane? Would be nice to run the 1700's then I can run E85 otherwise I will be stick with C16. Im moving to Kingsport TN and they have E85 at the dam gas pump there! But considering I get 9.5 MPG now I wont be using E very often. Again, this is my DD. I have other cars to drive but I love driving this and drive it every day!
Last edited: